Just how many cases of sexual violence and discrimination have been overlooked?
By Sang-sun Jeong
Published: March 30,
2020
Translated
by Chloe Sherliker
※ Editor’s note: The following article covers the Telegram Nth room sexual exploitation case
within the context of the village of Sannae, near Jirisan. It is written by
Sang-sun Jeong, who is currently engaging in a one-woman protest to make her
village safe for everyone.
In
February 2018, the organisation with which I am now affiliated - Jirisan
Women’s Association to End Sexual Violence [hereafter “Jirisan Women’s
Assocation”] - was officially launched. This came in response to numerous
reports of sexual violence in the Sannae Indramang community, a Buddhism-based
intentional community. During the initial process of establishing the
organisation, several individuals suggested that rules for self-governance
would also be helpful in preventing sexual violence within the wider local community.
In this way, the Gender Equality Committee came into being.
It was
recommended that the committee should undergo in-depth relevant study before
properly commencing its work. Therefore in order to help the new organisation
get on its feet, members of the Jirisan Women’s Association and the committee
came together once a month to study issues relating to gender equality, sexual
violence and sexual awareness. But after running these meetings for just six
months, another incident of sexual harassment was reported within Sannae.
How
could there be yet another incident of sexual violence in my community;
especiailly when we were in the very process of setting up both an association
and rules to prevent ongoing sexual violence? Was there really any hope at all
for improvement in my home village?
‘Don’t go causing trouble’ -
the words heard by victims and never by perpetrators
Twenty-three
minutes and 35 seconds. This is the average time between one case of sexual
offence and another in Korea (as stated in the 2015 press release of the
National Assembly Safety Administration Committee). We live in a society where
sexual violence happens, at a minimum, every 23 minutes and 35 seconds. Less
than 10% of victims report the crimes, and even among that small number of
reports, only 44.8% of perpetrators are prosecuted. This is the lowest prosecution
rate for any violent crime. Given these grim statistics, how can there have
been so many reports of sexual violence in Sannae?
Unsurprisingly,
sexually violent crimes are especially likely to be minimized and covered up.
But still, it is difficult to claim that people in Sannae have a particularly
poor view of women, or unique gender stereotypes. Instead, it seems that we
refuse to allow incidents of sexual violence and discrimination to fade away
into unreported statistics as in other areas and organisations. But what is it
then about the Sannae community that has resulted in these high reporting
levels?
In a
society where incidents are remembered by the name of the victim instead of
that of the offender, and the mainstream media uncritically reports the
offender’s account of events, victims of sexual assault often find it difficult
to come forward with their experiences. There are further many instances when
the victim themselves struggles to understand that what they have experienced
was sexual assault.
Perpetrators
often receive external assistance from wider society in concealing their crimes.
People around the victim tell them:
‘Don’t
go causing trouble now.’
‘Don’t
kick up a fuss.’
In
Sannae, however, women have been able to avoid these recommendations to follow
the status quo. They see local unity against sexual harassment in the Gender
Equality Committee, and they know that they can access support and counselling
if and when they need it.
The
reason that these cases of sexual harrassment were able to come to light in the
Sannae Community was primarily due to the resolve of the victims. These women
focused less on the risk of damage to their own personal lives, and more on how
revealing these incidents could allow for their local community to evolve and
reflect on sexual crime.
Furthermore,
after the Gender Equality Committee announced that they would not allow the new
case to be trivially dismissed, directors from the local Silsang Temple Standing
Committee [which owns the land on which Indramang is located] came forward to
publicly support the committee. The two groups decided to take joint action.
They hoped that this would ensure that perpetrators would feel the weight of
their crimes, and engage in critical self-action to prevent future re-offenses.
Firstly,
the committees arranged counselling for victims and interview sessions with
perpetrators. Afterward, perpetrators read a letter of reflection in front of
local residents. Rather than freely exchanging their opinions on the situation,
residents were asked to remain silent and take some time to think.
The
Gender Equality Committee conducted ten educational sessions for the
perpetrator, and two sessions of gender equality training for local community
members in the first half of the year. In addition, the nature of the incident
and the subsequent process undertaken by the Committee were both published in a
local newsletter for the Indramang community. These promising results reflected
the unflinching resolve of the Gender Equality Committee. Backed with support
from the Standing Real Estate Committee, it was hoped that this incident would
ultimately function as an opportunity to raise awareness on the severity of
local sexual harassment and sexual crimes.
Because I will not live in their ‘peaceful’ village
Naturally, the program did not operate completely smoothly.
‘Is this all really necessary?
‘Think of the shame you are bringing on his family’
‘Who exactly are you doing this for?’
‘Is this really the most peaceful way you could have done things?’
We were reproached constantly with such criticisms, both face-to-face and in more indirect manners. But for every question we received, we would respond frankly:
‘Yes, this is all completely necessary.’
‘Don’t concern yourself with his family, and please spend some time thinking about what makes you embarrassed and uncomfortable about this.’
‘We are doing this for the good of everyone.’
‘This is not peaceful? So what do you think ‘peaceful’ means?’
(As a side note, I actually ran into one of the families in question at a neighborhood cafe. They bowed to me and greeted me kindly, and asked for continued help to learn more in the future.)
The
experiences of victims of sexual violence are often hidden away, meaning
reports of sexual crimes likewise are reduced. This creates a village that is
safe not for everyone but only for ‘them’: the perpetrators. Concealing sexual
violence behind a facade of ‘peace’ causes civic and communal consciousness to
fade away. It should therefore follow that those who talk about the value of
the community should be equally concerned with equality, peace and equity.
But
uprooting this culture has frequently been very nerve-racking. It has been difficult
to encourage residents who have lived in the village for over ten years to
engage in our educational programs - particularly as part of the program
involves making them understand that they may have been compliant or even
supportive of gendered violence.
I
remember how cold the winter breeze was on the first day of one of our training
program. Both the facilitators and the participants found the whole situation
so awkward they couldn’t even look each other in the eye. But even at that
early stage, we knew that this was the best way for things to improve. We
needed to say things that had never been said, and face things that had never
been addressed before.
During
the last day of the ten-session program, one of the participants who had
originally been highly resistant to taking part said to us: ‘Thinking back, I
realise now that there is a connection between my actions today as an adult,
and the pornography that I was exposed to and watched as a teenager.’
Educational
programs for perpetrators of sexual assault are critical as they help men to
face up to their own responsibilities and actions in a way that they couldn’t
before. Obviously legal retribution for crime is important, but there is a
clear limit to how useful it can be if the perpetrator still fails to recognise
his own personal problems, and if communal norms continue in the same stagnant
way as before.
Yet
while it is important that the perpetrator recognises that his actions were harmful,
we must also recognise that we cannot arbitrarily decide who counts as a
perpetrator or how he can receive forgiveness. It is also imperative that
members of the local community look at what their ‘peaceful’ village really is:
who the ‘peace’ is for, and whether this ‘peace’ exists for every resident.
This process will help in reviving civic and communal consciousness, and a
local sense of equality and equity. Even one incident should be enough for the
whole community to reflect on their way of thinking. Instead of brushing such
cases aside as being someone else’s business, the whole community should feel a
sense of responsibility and come together to solve the issue. In that way, we
can create a truly ‘peaceful’ environment for everybody.
‘I’m more of a victim here than they are.’
These
are not the words of a woman who was subjected to sexual violence. These are,
in fact, the protests of a male manager who was involved in a sexual assault in
a neighbouring town a few years ago.
‘I’m
sorry. But I will not allow the case to become public.’
This
was the stance of the local village leader at the location of the sexual
assault.
‘This
isn’t the way we should go about things, for the benefit of the people living
in this village.’
This
was the criticism aimed at local feminist groups, who suggested that the
community look further into rural gender norms.
The
offender then went on to apply for the local Village Youth Fund, meaning that
the Funding Committee should have explained to him why he was no longer a
suitable candidate. But the leading commissioner instead asked, ‘Why don’t we
let bygones be bygones and just give him the funds?’
Set misogyny and sexual
violence against women as an urgent local agenda
Last
week, I began my one-woman protest at an intersection in my village to raise
awareness in my community about the Nth room sexual exploitation case enabled
by the Telegram app.
It
is estimated that there were over 26,000 men (though this number may include
some duplicate accounts) in the “Nth room” chatrooms, actively contributing to
sexual exploitation, violence and sexual trafficking. Another 60,000 men
circulated and downloaded these sexually exploitative videos outside of the chatrooms.
Already
I can hear the protests. ‘I had never even heard of Telegram.’ ‘I would never
be involved in something like that.’ ‘“Not all men” - don’t treat us like we’re
potential rapists.’ But of course, the situation is different when they’re
making sexually degrading jokes in bars; when they’re laughing about men being breadwinners
and women making sandwiches; when they’re objectifying women as sexual prizes
to be won; when they dictate the lives of their daughters. But I digress.
Ultimately, all of these patriarchal mindsets contributed towards the creation of
the Nth rooms.
But
my real concern here isn’t how many Nth room users actually exist in my
community. Instead, I believe that it’s more important that we focus on
addressing everyday sexism and gender in our village. The Sannae community has
only now begun to break away from the old critique telling us not to rock the
boat or disrupt the ‘peace’ in our little village. This communal ‘peace’ has
constantly been an excuse - when women started creating local magazines for
women; when women asked for further study on rural ideas of gender and sex;
when we tried to publicise the incidents of sexual violence in our community.
Now it is time for us to collectively face the dark consequences of concealing
and covering women’s voices in the name of this communal ‘peace’.
Prosecutor
Seo Ji-hyun, who joined the Ministry of Justice's Digital Task Force on
Spreading Gender Equality Culture a few days ago, mentioned that Korea was
currently in the midst of a digital ‘national crisis’. It’s not ‘pornography’,
or ’smut’. It’s large-scale sexual exploitation, human trafficking and sexual
assault online - all of which stem from the fundamental problem of everyday gender
discrimination.
I
hope with all my heart that Sannae becomes a place where anyone and everyone
can live in safety. I hope that our village becomes known not only for being
first in farming and as an alternative communal mecca, but also for having a
welcoming local community free from sexual violence. Rather than hiding away
with excuses of not knowing and not being involved, I wish for sexual violence
to become a social issue that involves all members of the community coming
together and accepting collective responsibility for the end goal of real
change.
![]() |
A
local resident who joined my protest in solidarity for a day after hearing
about my one-woman protest. © Sang-sun
Jeong
|
The sexual offenders of the Nth rooms will not simply go away with increased crackdowns and the threat of punishment. Only when society as a whole identifies the link between gender and violence; when we break away from old trends of justifying gender discrimination; and when we learn more about feminism and recognise our rights in relation to gender and sex will these sexual offences decrease. Luckily, my village already has some experience now in effectively responding to sexual violence. I hope that this will allow for my local community in Sannae to take the lead in inspiring such change in local communities across the whole of Korea.
On the
fourth day of my protest, I noticed that the atmosphere felt a little different
from the past three days. Local village residents waved to me as they passed
and shouted words of encouragement, and some even handed me drinks. When I
returned home after finishing my protest for the day, I got the following text
from one of my friends:
‘I was
talking to my colleague today at the workshop about what we could do to show
support for your protest. For now, we’ve left a little something for you at the
local convenience store. Let me know if there’s anything else you need!’
I would
like to suggest that the most urgent local agenda for every region,
organisation and school is adopting measures against sexual discrimination and
violence. We need to eradicate sexual exploitation and sexual entertainment
culture, and collectively re-evaluate gender-related culture as a whole. I will
continue my one-woman protest on sexual discrimination and the Nth room case
until we see real change.
Original
article: http://ildaro.com/8683



No comments:
Post a Comment