The
stories of sexually active teenagers as told through the EVE report and The
Condom Them
By Park Ju-yeon
Published Feb. 1, 2020
Translated by Marilyn
Hook
“Results that are
inappropriate for youth have been excluded. Prove your age to see all of the
results.”
This is what you see on
a portal site if you search for “youth” and “condom”. The voting age may have
been lowered to 18, but it is still “inappropriate” for teenagers to learn
about condoms. Are condoms really dangerous or inappropriate for young people?
![]() |
| The cover and table of contents of the “2019 Teen Sex Survey” conducted by EVE. [English added by translator.] |
According to the “2019
Teen Sex Survey” published by the social venture firm EVE, 54.7% of a group of
1,348 youth between the ages of 10 and 19 said that they had had sex. If being
sexually active is the experience of more than half of teenagers, then their
stories need to be much more visible than they are now.
In addition, Seoul’s
Gallery Vinci held “The Condom Exhibition – Neither Criticism, Nor Shame, Nor
Boasting” (hosted by JaSaekGoGuMe and the youth feminist network WeTee) from
January 30th to February 2nd. As a chance for teens to talk openly about sex,
most of the participating artists were teenagers. Because they share a focus on
teenage voices that have not been heard before, I’ve decided to write about the
contents of EVE’s report and the message of The Condom Exhibition together.
Condoms aren’t
dangerous, unsafe sex is
① Lack of places to have sex
Youth who are treated as
if their even learning about condoms is “inappropriate” have a very difficult
time finding a place to have sex. It is even harder to find a safe place to do
it.
According to EVE’s “2019
Teen Sex Survey”, most teenagers who have had sex say they have done it at
their or someone else’s home (53.3%), while room cafes, DVD rooms, public
bathrooms, and emergency exit stairwells are also mentioned. To the question
“Have you ever felt uncomfortable in the main place where you have sex”, 64% of
respondents answered “Yes”.
Among the works on the
display at “The Condom Exhibition – Neither Criticism, Nor Shame, Nor
Boasting”, you could also find writings revealing experiences with unpleasant
places to have sex: “The floor was really dirty. Even if you just brushed it
with your hand, it would leave a smear of black dust. And we sat on that floor
and had sex.”
② Unease after sex
Experiences of sex in an
unclean or unsafe place are connected with feelings of unease. And anxiety
about pregnancy also looms large. Eighty-two percent of the teenagers who’ve
had sex reported unease afterwards, with 3.9% feeling so anxious that it
interfered with their daily lives.
The fact that, despite
that, only 32.9% have been to an ob-gyn or urologist deserves attention. Among
those who’ve been to a doctor, 30.6% said that the reason it was burdensome was
because of the expensive fee, from which we can conjecture that teenagers, who
often don’t have money of their own, feel that they cannot ask adults for help
in order to visit an ob-gyn or urologist.
We can also guess that
they have not been given sex education that includes content like, “If you
suspect that you’ve caught an STD, you should visit a medical facility and get
tested.”
![]() |
| A work from “The Condom Exhibition” that uses actual condoms. © Ilda |
③ Barriers to the use of condoms
The fact that teenagers
are not receiving decent sex education can also be seen in the area of birth
control. Among teenagers who’ve had sex, 73.4% said they use a condom. The next
most common method was pulling out (39.2%), even though this cannot be called a
proper form of birth control. The most common reason for not using a condom was
“It reduces sensation” (35.2%).
At the same time, there
were also answers like “They’re a burden to buy because they’re expensive”,
“I’m afraid that people will find out I’m having sex”, and “They won’t sell
them to me because of my age”. This clearly reveals the problems of social
stigma around teenage condom use and condoms’ low accessibility to teens.
What we are reminded of
from these results is that what makes it dangerous for teenagers to have sex is
our society’s limiting their knowledge about sex and access to condoms and
other forms of birth control, so that the only kind of sex they can have is the
unsafe kind.
Teens’ diverse sexual
identities
Another noticeable thing
about both the EVE report and The Condom Exhibition is how teenagers are
escaping the biological sex dichotomy and heterocentrism.
In answer to the
question of what sex they identified as, 48.2% of respondents to the “2019 Teen
Sex Survey” identified as female, 45.4% identified as male, 3.6% identified as
intersex, 1.5% chose “undecided”, and 1.3% chose “not applicable”. In addition, 75.4% said they are
heterosexual, 12% said they are bisexual, 3.9% said they are pansexual, 3.6%
said they are homosexual, 3.4% said they are undecided, 1.1% said they are
asexual, and 0.7% chose “not applicable”.
![]() |
| The
voices of queer teenagers were also present in “The Condom Exhibition”. © Ilda |
But it was clear that we
don’t provide teenagers with enough information while they’re going through the
process of considering their sexual identity and exploring who they are, and
information about sexual intercourse is especially limited.
Just like non-queer
(heterosexual) teens, queer teens search the Internet using terms like “birth
control information” and “how to increase sexual satisfaction”. When asked if
the results that came up for these searches were satisfactory, 42.9% of survey
respondents said “Yes”, which is noticeably lower than the 64.3% positive
response rate among non-queer respondents.
Teens’ access to
information about sex is already limited, but if you add the filter of
queerness, there is even greater difficulty. I think it’s time we considered
how we can conduct sex ed in a way that doesn’t exclude queer youth.
“Neither criticism, nor boasting, nor shame”
“The Condom Exhibition –
Neither Criticism, Nor Shame, Nor Boasting” was a space full of the voices of
young people attempting to share their stories through the medium of condoms.
JaSaekGoGuMe, one of the organizations that cohosted it, says their name comes
from a phrase that translates to “me who thinks about autonomous sexuality”.
This how they explained their motivations for putting on the exhibition:
“It seems like we’re
distorting condoms – and sexuality, sex, feminism, masturbation – with the
sexual beliefs that porn has created. We wonder whether sex isn’t being thought
of as only provocative, vulgar, and racy, so we felt we needed to do a project
that makes people think again.”
Through their condom
exhibit, which “raises the issue of existing sexual discourse being produced
mainly by and for adult men, and centers women/queer people/youth in order to
find new language and desires”, JaSaekGoGuMe wanted to make society aware that
condoms aren’t the problem.
![]() |
| A
scrapbook work from “The Condom Exhibition”. [The handwriting at the bottom is quoted in the paragraph below.] © Ilda |
The quote “It wouldn’t
have been an exaggeration to say that, for me, discourse about sex was
‘non-existent’” (excerpted from a scrapbook work in The Condom Exhibition) will
likely feel familiar to many people who aren’t teenagers. Walking around the
exhibition, you can’t help but wonder what is really putting whom in danger.
The Condom Exhibition’s
contents reflect the intense thought and questioning of the people who made it,
their resistance to a culture that consumes teens’ sexuality through porn but
excludes and prohibits the sexual expression of actual teens, and honest words
about their experiences of sex. Through it, we can see the dynamic movement of
those who are attempting to face their sexuality as a source of neither
criticism, nor boasting, nor shame.
*Original article:
http://ildaro.com/8642





No comments:
Post a Comment